ITEM ‑ 58(b)
October 26, 1962
This has reference to your letter of
October 11, 1962 submitting docket of time claims which were reviewed with you
in conference on October 24, 1962, and with particular reference to claim for
road switcher rate for brakemen assigned to Ogden switcher retroactive to
October 1, 1961.
As a basis for this claim, you cite
Section 2(c) of the Agreement dated June 2, 1958 in connection with Union
Pacific acquiring a portion of the Bamburger Railroad Company, and the
Agreement dated September 7, 1961, modifying Rule 58, "Combination Switch
and Road Service" of the cur_ rent schedule.
When the agreement dated September 7,
1961, effective October 1, 1961, modifying Rule 58 was negotiated, it was not
definitely determined whether the Ogden Switcher was to be included in view of
the agreement of June 2, 1958 providing for yard rates of pay when that
switcher worked only 5 days per week, and local rates when it worked 6 or 7
days per week.
You contend, however, that it was
definitely understood that the rates provided for in Modified Rule 58 would
apply to all brakemen assigned under that rule, including the Ogden switcher.
The crew on the Ogden Switcher
apparently did not consider they came under the provisions of the September 7,
1961 Agreement modifying Rule 58 as they submitted no claims under that
agreement. Prior to June 1, 1962, they merely claimed local switcher rate, and
subsequent to that date, they merely claimed time under Rule 58. They have been
allowed the local rate of pay as they were assigned 6 days per week. It was not
until Local Chairman Tyree's letter of July 5, 1962 to the Head Timekeeper
that any mention was made of the rate of pay as provided for in the September
7, l96l Agreement.
I am agreeable, however, to considering
that the Ogden Switcher is within the scope of Rule 58 as modified by the
Agreement dated September 7, 1961, and to allowing the brakemen on that
switcher the rate of pay as provided for therein, retroactive to April l, l962.
This wil1 constitute full and final
settlement of the claims presented in your letter of September l3, 1962.