MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
#2401050393
(2210-1)
Between
UNION
PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
and
UNITED
TRANSPORTATION UNION
****************************************************************************
VACATION AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATION MODIFICATIONS
****************************************************************************
Union Pacific Railroad Company (hereinafter “UP,” “Company” or
“Carrier” and the United Transportation Union (hereinafter “UTU” or
“Organization”) acknowledge that, because of the various rail mergers and
consolidations, different practices and applications of some agreement
provisions have evolved. Consequently,
the parties recognize there is a benefit to both UP and its employees to have a
more uniform and standardized method for applying certain agreement provisions.
This agreement is thus a part of an effort to standardize the handling of
certain agreement provisions.
UP and UTU
jointly desire to modify, streamline and standardize agreement provisions
governing the qualification for, and scheduling of, trainmen/yardmen vacation
benefits. Accordingly, IT IS AGREED:
ARTICLE I.
CROSS-CRAFT QUALIFICATION
A.
Effective January 1, 2003, Article III, Section 1, Paragraphs (a), (b),
(c), (d) and (e) of the January 27, 1972 UTU National Agreement, as amended,
will be modified and applied as follows:
Previous
years of service in a non-operating agreement covered craft with Union Pacific
will be considered in determining the number of vacation week(s) a former
non-operating craft employee will qualify if he/she is employed in train
service.
Example:
A non-operating agreement covered employee with seven (7) years of prior
service on Union Pacific is employed in train service.
That employee has qualified for vacations under his/her non-operating
vacation agreement all of the preceding seven (7) years.
He/she will be considered as having met the minimum qualifying and
accumulation requirements necessary in qualifying for vacation weeks as a
trainman for all seven (7) years. If
a non-operating agreement covered employee qualified for vacation under
the non-operating vacation agreement only five (5) of those seven (7) years,
only the five (5) years he/she qualified for vacation would be considered in
determining number of weeks vacation he/she would be entitled as a trainman.
Thereafter, qualifying criteria would be governed/accumulated under the
operating vacation agreement.
B.
Non-operating craft employees will not be permitted to duplicate or
pyramid vacation weeks upon transferring to train service.
In the calendar year a transfer to train service occurs, non-operating
employees may be required to observe all of their vacation from a non-operating
craft before transferring, time and service requirements permitting.
Unused vacation from a non-operating craft that cannot be observed prior
to transferring to train service may, at the Carrier’s discretion, be
scheduled or paid in lieu thereof.
C.
Employees not yet qualifying for vacation in the following year in the
pre-transfer craft or position will be entitled to combine the prior
non-operating service with train service for qualifying purposes in the calendar
year of the transfer. In effect,
the service in the pre-transfer craft or position will be treated as train
service for qualifying purposes.
ARTICLE II.
VACATION SPLITS
Commencing
January 1, 2003 – i.e., for vacation benefits for calendar year 2003 –
employees may request the maximum number of splits to allow for a weekly
scheduling of their allotted vacation weeks.
Such splits shall not be in less than one-week increments.
(Example: a maximum of four
splits will be allowed for an employee qualifying for five (5) weeks of
vacation.)
ARTICLE III.
SINGLE DAY VACATION ALLOTMENT
A.
Commencing January 1, 2003, employees having less than three (3)
weeks of single day vacations may designate up to three (3) weeks of their
allotted number of vacation weeks to be utilized as single vacation day(s).
NOTE:
Employees already entitled to more than three weeks of single day
vacations, if any, will retain their present entitlement.
B.
All single vacation days will be scheduled.
If they are scheduled in a one-week block (or two or three-week block),
employees can use single days from that block prior to the scheduled time by
rescheduling the day (or days) with CMS. Any
unused portion of the single days must be taken at the scheduled time.
C.
1.
A week of single day’s vacation for employees holding regular yard
service assignments and extra boards protecting yard service exclusively shall
consist of five (5) days.
2.
A week of single day’s vacation for employees holding positions in
road service or on combination road/yard extra board shall consist of seven (7)
days.
ARTICLE IV.
VACATION GROUP
A.
The scheduling of an employee’s vacation for the upcoming or
current year shall be based on the location and class(es) of service where
he/she was assigned for a preponderance of the time during the six (6)-month
qualification measurement period. The qualification measurement period shall be April1 through
September 30.
NOTE:
This does not affect arrangements under which craft (i.e., engineer,
hostler, train service) is determined for vacation scheduling purposes.
B.
The provisions of this Article IV shall not serve to alter existing
practices or Agreement provisions governing vacation groupings and other matters
regarding the scheduling of vacation.
ARTICLE V.
GENERAL AND SAVINGS CLAUSES
A.
The increasing of vacation opportunities and flexibility as set forth
herein shall not cause Carrier to incur any additional employee protection
expense or guarantee payments as a result thereof.
B.
In the event the provisions of this Agreement conflict with a
provision of any other agreement, understanding or practice, the
provisions set forth herein shall prevail and apply.
C.
Existing rules and practices regarding the handling of vacations not
specifically amended by this Agreement, including, but not limited to,
scheduling of vacations, scheduling of single days vacation, and handling of
vacation splits and/or single day vacations, shall continue in effect without
change.
D.
This Agreement is made without prejudice to the position of either
party and will not be referred to in connection with any other agreement (local
or national and shall remain in effect subject to revision pursuant to the
provisions of the Railway Labor Act.
SIGNED THIS _____th DAY OF _____________,
2002 IN OMAHA, NEBRASKA
FOR THE UNITED
FOR THE UNION PACIFIC
TRANSPORATION UNION
RAILROAD COMPANY
_______________________
________________________
D.L. Hazlett
S.F. Boone
General Chairman
Director – Labor Relations
________________________
________________________
M.B. Futhey
A.T. Olin
Vice President – UTU
General Director – Labor Relations
****************************************************************************************************************************
Side Letter No. 1
MOA #2401060393
Zone 3 Portland Hub
Mr. D.L. Hazlett
General Chairman - UTU
5990 South West 28, Ste F.
Topeka, Ks. 66614-4181
Dear Sir:
This will confirm our discussion concerning the intent of Article V,
Section A of the Vacation Administration Modification Agreement reading:
“The
increasing of vacation opportunities and flexibility as set forth herein shall
not cause Carrier to incur any additional employee protection expense or
guarantee payments as a result thereof.”
The purpose of this section is to keep the Vacation Administration
Modification Agreement cost neutral with respect to protection and
administration costs. However, the application of this section is intended to be
without prejudice to the positions of either party with respect to existing
Labor Protection or Timekeeping administrative practices, i.e., manner in which
the Protection Administration Group or Timekeeping applies offsets to guarantee
which the Organization does not concur. Such disputes will be resolved through
the normal grievance process with this agreement having no impact on the
position of the parties.
If this correctly reflects your understanding of the intent of this
agreement please sign below in the space provided.
Agreed:
Yours truly,
____________________
S.F. Boone
D.L. Hazlett
Director – Labor Relations
General Chairman - UTU
***********************************************************************************************************************************************
Side Letter No. 2
MOA #2401060393
Zone 3 Portland Hub
Mr. D.L. Hazlett
General Chairman - UTU
5990 South West 28, Ste F.
Topeka, Ks. 66614-4181
Dear Sir:
This will
confirm our discussion concerning the intent of Articles II and III of the
Vacation Administration Modification Agreement.
The parties are in agreement single day vacation allotments and/or weekly
splits scheduled, assigned and/or granted pursuant to the Vacation Modification
Agreement does not extend additional vacation time or deprive any employee of
vacation earned as provided by the National Vacation Agreements.
For example, an employee qualifying for only two weeks of vacation in a
calendar year may designate only two weeks to be utilized as single days.
Article III, Item A does not grant additional weeks or single days beyond that
provided by the National Vacation Agreement.
If this
correctly reflects your understanding of the intent of this agreement please
sign below in the space provided.
Agreed:
Yours truly,
D.L. Hazlett
S.F. Boone
General Chairman - UTU
Director – Labor Relations
|