QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS - BLE PORTLAND HUB ZONE 1
Article
I - PORTLAND HUB
Q1.
Article 1 identifies the three zones for this
Agreement. Do
all the provisions of this Agreement apply to all three
zones?
A1.
No, while all three zones are mentioned in Article
I, the Agreement covers Zone 1 unless specifically stated
otherwise in a given section.
Article
II - SENIORITY
AND WORK CONSOLIDATION
Q2.
How long will prior
rights be in effect?
A2.
They will be phased out over a six year period.
Q3.
Are full time union officers including full time
state legislative board representatives, Company officers,
medical leaves and those on leave working for government
agencies covered under Article II, C?
A3.
Yes.
Q4
.
Article II (M) refers to yard assignment
allocations with respect to prior rights.
How are assigned yard work trains treated?
A4.
Assigned yard work trains are part of the
allocation.
Q5.
Article II (H) requires engineers to protect all
assignments with
a home terminal within a thirty mile radius of the
Portland Terminal limits.
Can you give some examples of how that will work
for both regular and extra board assignments?
A5.
The first criteria is that the home terminal must
be within thirty
miles of the terminal limits.
The away from home terminal may be outside the
thirty limits so an employee as part of his/her assignment
may travel outside the thirty miles.
For example.
Example
1: A pool runs from
Portland to Hinkle. This
assignment is within the thirty mile limit even though it
has an away from home terminal at Hinkle, outside the
limits. Therefore
all 1st, 2nd and SP prior right engineers could be
required to protect the assignment.
Example
2: A southbound pool
assignment dies on the hours of service 40 miles north of
Portland. While
the train is not within the thirty mile zone, the extra
board on duty point is at Portland.
As such, if the extra board is used to dogcatch the
train, the first out employee would be used, even if an SP
prior right employee.
Example
3: A road switcher
with an on duty point 45 miles north of Portland goes no
bid. An SP
prior right employee on the protecting extra board at
Portland could fill the assignment pending the force
assignment of an engineer because that is one of the
duties of the extra board, but a SP prior right employee
could not be forced to the vacancy as the permanent
occupant.
Q6.
If Article IX of the 1986 National Arbitration
Award is amended in the future, what will govern when that
Article is mentioned in this Agreement?
A6.
As in all cases, amendments to agreements govern
unless previous rules are specifically retained in a
savings clause in the amendment provisions.
Q7.
In Article II (E) (4) what are some of the
assignments that are non-pool and non-yard in the thirty
mile zone.
A7.
At the time of printing this document there was a
Vancouver Local, two garbage trains and one Oregon City
road switcher.
Q8.
Do SP leaves of absence agreements remain in place
for those engineers who are currently on a leave?
A8.
Yes, SP leaves of absence agreements shall continue
in force for those engineers on a leave on the date of
implementation until they return to service.
Q9.
If an SP engineer on a leave of absence returns to
service and an engineer senior to him/her has been forced
to Dunsmuir does the returning junior engineer have to
replace that forced engineer?
A9.
Yes, the junior engineer must relieve a senior
engineer with a request to return and the junior engineer
will have the same rights to file a request to return
within the time limits of that agreement.
ARTICLE
III - POOL OPERATIONS
Q10.
What will be the mileage paid in the Portland to
Oakridge and Oakridge to Klamath Falls?
A10.
The mileage paid will be the actual mileage between
the two points of the assignments.
The points will be from the Albina yard office to
Oakridge and from the same point at Oakridge to Klamath
Falls using the time table.
It does not matter if the engineer picks up his/her
train at other location in the Portland terminal, the
mileage shall be the same.
Q11.
Will existing pool freight terms and conditions
apply on all pool freight runs?
A11.
No. The terms and conditions set forth in the
surviving collective
bargaining agreements and this document will govern.
For example, the basic Idaho ID provisions
governing overtime, initial terminal delay, held away from
home time, etc will apply to the pools in accordance with
the engineers eligibility for those provisions based on
his/her seniority.
Q12.
Does this agreement affect The Dalles as a home
terminal for work to Bend and
short pool service to Hinkle?
A12.
No, however it does not prohibit the implementation
of other service in accordance with the controlling CBA or
National Agreement provisions that does not use The Dalles
as a home terminal.
Q13.
During the one year period covering the use of
longer applications procedures for moving new assignments
to Portland and Oakridge in Article III (C) (Note), how
will the pool be regulated?
A13.
The pool will be regulated in accordance with the
provisions of the CBA.
Engineers must understand that the longer
application process may result in the pool running short
while waiting for additional engineers to relocate and the
extra board will be used first to cover the vacancies.
Q14.
Does the one year period in Article III (C) (note)
refer to moving allowance eligibility?
A14.
No, only to the period for a longer application
process.
ARTICLE
IV - EXTRA BOARDS
Q15.
How many extra boards will be combined at
implementation?
A15.
The Portland extra boards have a phase in time
table for consolidation.
Q16.
Are these guaranteed extra boards?
A16.
Yes. The pay provisions and guarantee offsets and
reductions will be in accordance with the
surviving CBA guaranteed extra board agreement.
The Eugene and Oakridge extra boards will also be
governed by the surviving CBA.
ARTICLE
V - TERMINAL CONSOLIDATIONS
Q17.
Are the national road/yard Zones covering yard
crews measured from
the new Portland terminal limits
where the yard assignment goes on duty?
A17.
No, see the August 7, 1987 Agreement that extended
the limits for the UP mainline limits.
Crews that go on duty at Brooklyn will now be able
to go North and East from Portland and those on duty on
former UP areas will now be able to go South from
Portland.
Q18.
Are foreign interchanges within the UP Portland
terminal?
A18.
The National Agreements permit crews to receive and
deliver trains to foreign carriers even if outside the
home carrier’s “terminal”.
There is a larger “terminal” at interchange
points that includes all the trackage of all the Carrier
terminals at that location.
As such at Portland, a crew may receive and or
deliver a train to any of the locations that were
permissible prior to the merger by either the SP or UP.
ARTICLE
VI - AGREEMENT COVERAGE
Q19.
When the surviving CBA becomes effective what
happens to existing claims
filed under the other collective bargaining agreements
that formerly existed in the Portland Hub?
A19.
The existing claims shall continue to be handled in
accordance with those agreements and the Railway Labor
Act. No new
claims shall be filed under those agreements once the time
limit for filing claims has expired for events that took
place prior to the implementation date.
Q20.
Are any constructive miles or trip “guarantee”
paid in pool freight service retained?
A20.
Yes, however only to those engineers currently
eligible for them. If
an engineer on the Second District is eligible for them on
that District and moves to a pool turn in the
Seattle-Portland Pool they shall not be eligible
for constructive miles or “guarantee” in that pool.
Q21.
Article VI (B) (1) refers to turnaround service
being performed at home terminals by pool crews.
Does this rule require that they be called before
or after extra board crews are called?
A21.
No, at the home terminal of the assignment,
if the extra board is exhausted regular vacancy
procedures apply.
Q22.
Is Article VI (D) (1) a short turn around rule?
A22.
No, it is a through freight provision which enables
an engineer to get his own train outside the terminal and
run on through the terminal.
Q23.
The same section calls for multiple trips in one
tour of duty. If
the extra board rule and pool freight rule differ on the
procedures to be used in multiple trips, what rule
governs?
A23.
The extra board rule governs when the extra board
is called and the pool rules govern when a pool crew is
used.
Q24.
Can the separate 2nd and 3rd District extra boards
be used on both sides of Hinkle upon implementation of
this agreement?
A24.
Until zone two is covered by an agreement/award the
Hinkle extra boards will not be used on both sides, except
when the 3rd District board is used when the 2nd district
board is exhausted. However
when the 2nd District extra board is filled by 3rd
District engineers then the engineers on that extra board
can go West of Hinkle.
Q25.
When can extra boards at Portland perform this
service in any direction?
A25.
When the 1st and 2nd District boards are combined
they can cover both of their former areas and when the SP
board is combined then the remaining board can go in all
directions. If
an extra yard assignment is called in accordance with
road/yard provisions then that assignment off the
consolidated board can go in all directions.
Q26.
How far can an extra board go in performing this
service?
A26.
Existing division points for extra boards will be
used.
Q27.
Are fence Agreements covering The Dalles and Bend
retained?
A27.
Yes, and will be considered part of the controlling
CBA.
Q28.
Will the August 10, 1994 Temporary Transfer
Agreement be retained?
A28.
Yes, since engineers are currently working outside
the Hub under this Agreement, the parties have agreed to
retain it.
Q29.
Do the references to Local Chairman refer only to
BLE Local Chairmen?
A29.
Yes.
Q30.
What are the miles paid if an Engineer goes to the
BNSF at Vancouver to get a train to go to Oakridge?
A30.
The actual additional miles run with train and or
engine from the BNSF facility to the Albina yard office
shall be paid whether getting or leaving a train in
interchange.
Q31.
If a road crew picks up, in interchange, a train
from the BNSF at Vancouver is it in the 25 mile zone?
A31.
No, this is an interchange movement that is
permitted even if the 25 mile zone provisions did not
exist.
Q32.
What if the road crew picked up a UP train at
Vancouver, not in interchange from the BNSF, is that
covered under the twenty-five mile provisions?
A32.
Yes, since it is outside the UP terminal and was
not received from a foreign Carrier.
Q33.
How will vacations for the remainder of 1998 be
handled?
A33.
They will continue to be handled under the CBA that
covered them at the beginning of the year.
Vacations for 1999 will be scheduled at the end of
1998 under the provisions of the Idaho Agreement.
In scheduling vacations for 1999 the SP
and UP assignments
at the Portland terminal shall be scheduled as two
separate groups. The extra boards, if not consolidated by
scheduling time, shall be scheduled with their respective
group. If consolidated they shall be scheduled with the UP
assignments. Beginning the next year all employees at the
Portland terminal shall be scheduled as one group.
Q34. Will the Carrier provide copies of the Idaho Agreement as currently printed.
A34.
Yes, In addition the parties will meet and review
the current printing and prepare a list of amendments to
that CBA and reprint a new CBA and the Carrier shall
distribute the new reprinting.
Q35.
Does the 25 mile zone in Article VI (D) (1) start
from MP 17 on the UP main line?
A35.
No, it starts from the same point as the road/yard
zone which is 12.25 (Graham)and 14.5(Kenton).
Q36.
If a crew in the 25 mile zone is delayed in
bringing the train into the original terminal so that it
does not have time to go on to the far terminal, what will
happen to the crew?
A36.
Except in cases of emergency, the crew will be
deadheaded on to the far terminal.
Q37.
Is it the intent of this agreement to use crews
beyond the 25 mile zone?
A37.
No. The
engineer would be operating off assignment.
Q38.
In Article IV(B), is the ½ basic day for operating
in the 25 mile zone frozen and/or is it a duplicate
payment/ special allowance?
A38.
No, it is subject to future wage adjustments and it
is not duplicate pay/special allowance.
Q39.
How is a crew paid if they operate in the 25 mile
zone?
A39.
If a pre-October 31, 1985 train/engine service
seniority date employee is transported to its train 10
miles south of Oakridge and he takes the train to Portland
and the time spent is one hour south of Oakridge and 10
hours 30 minutes between Oakridge and Portland with no
initial or final delay earned, the employee shall be paid
as follows:
A.
One-half basic day for the service South of
Oakridge because it is less than four hours spent in that
service.
B.
The road miles between Oakridge and Portland.
C.
Overtime based on the miles run between Oakridge
and Portland divided by 20 for the time up to the 10 hours
and 30 minutes worked between those two points.
(For example if the miles between Oakridge and
Portland were 168 then overtime would be after 8 hours and
24 minutes for an overtime payment of 2 hours 6 minutes.)
Q40.
Would a post October 31, 1985 train/engine service
employee be paid the same?
A40.
No. The
National Disputes Committee has determined that post
October 31, 1985 train/engine service employees come under
the overtime rules established under the National
Agreements/Awards/Implementing Agreements that were
effective after that date for both pre-existing runs and
subsequently established runs.
As such, the post October 31, 1985 engineer would
not receive the overtime
in C above but receive the payments in A & B.
Q41.
How will initial terminal delay be determined when
performing service as outlined above?
A41.
Initial terminal delay for crews entitled to such
payments will be governed by the applicable collective
bargaining agreement and will not commence when the crew
operates back through the on duty point.
Operation back through the on duty point
shall be considered as operating through an
intermediate point.
ARTICLE
VII - PROTECTION
Q42.
What rights does a engineer have if he/she is
already covered under
labor protection provisions resulting from another
transaction?
A42.
Section 3 of New York Dock permits engineers to
elect which labor protection they wish to be protected
under. By
agreement between the parties, if a engineer
has three years remaining due to the previous
implementation of Interdivisional Service the engineers
may elect to remain under that protection for three years
and then switch to the number of years remaining under
New York Dock.
It is important to remember that a engineer
may not receive duplicate benefits, extend their
protection period or count protection payments under
another protection provision toward their test period
average for this transaction.
Q43.
How will reductions from protection be calculated?
A43.
In an effort to minimize uncertainty concerning the
amount of reductions and simplify this process, the
parties have agreed to handle reductions from New York
Dock protection as follows:
1.
Pool freight assignments - 1/15 of
the monthly test period average will be reduced for each
unpaid absence of up to 48 hours or part thereof.
Absences beyond 48 hours will result in another
1/15 reduction for each additional 48 hour period or part
thereof.
2.
Five day assignments -
1/22 of the monthly test period average will be
reduced for each unpaid absence of up to 24 hours or part
thereof. Absences
beyond 24 hours will result in another 1/22 reduction for
each additional 24 hour period or part thereof.
3.
Six & seven day assignments - The
same process as above except 1/26 for a six day assignment
and 1/30 for a seven day assignment.
NOTE:
There shall be no offset from protection for rest days on
five day and six day
assignments,.
4.
Extra board assignments -
1/30 of the monthly test period average will be
reduced for each unpaid absence of up to 24 hours or part
thereof. Absences
beyond 24 hours will result in another 1/30 reduction for
each additional 24 hour period or part thereof.
NOTE:
Absences
on the extra board shall be calculated from the
time of unavailability (layoff, missed call, etc) until
the next time called for service.
For example: If
a engineer lays off on Monday at noon, marks up the next
day, Tuesday, and does not work until 2 AM on Wednesday,
then they shall be off for protection purposes for
thirty-eight (38) hours and shall be deducted 2/30 of
their protection.
Q44.
Why are there different dollar amounts for non-home
owners and homeowners?
A44.
New York Dock has two provisions covering
relocating. One
is Article I, Section 9, Moving Expenses and the
other is Section 12, Losses from Home Removal.
The $10,000 is in lieu of New York Dock moving
expenses and the remaining $20,000 is in lieu of loss on
sale of home.
Q45.
Why is there one price on loss
on sale of home
A45.
It is an in lieu of amount. Engineers have an
option of electing the in lieu of amount or claiming New
York Dock benefits. Some
people may not experience a loss on sale of home or want
to go through the procedures to claim the loss under New
York Dock.
Q46.
What is loss on sale of home for less than fair
value?
A46.
This refers to the loss on the value of the home
that results from the Carrier implementing
this merger transaction.
In many locations the impact of the merger may not
affect the value of a home and in some locations the
merger may affect the value of a home.
Q47.
If the parties cannot agree on the loss of fair
value what happens?
A47.
New York Dock Article I, Section 12(d) provides for
a panel of real estate appraisers to determine the value
before the merger announcement and the value after the
merger transaction.
Q48.
What happens if a engineer sells the home for
$20,000 to a family member?
A48.
That is not a bona fide sale and the engineer would
not be entitled to either an in lieu of payment or a New
York Dock payment for the difference below the fair value.
Q49.
What is the most difficult part of New York Dock in
the sale transaction?
A49.
Determine the value of the home before the merger
transaction. While
this can be done through the use of professional
appraisers, many people think their home is valued at a
different amount.
Q50.
Who is required to relocate and thus eligible for
the allowance?
A50.
A prior right engineer who can no longer hold a
position at his/her location and must relocate to hold a
position as a result of the merger.
This excludes engineers who are borrow outs or
forced inside the Hub and released, common engineers and
engineers who have to exercise seniority in their prior
rights area due to a non merger event.
Example
1: Due to the new
Portland-Oakridge pool an employee can no longer hold in
Eugene and must relocate to Portland. Since this is a
result of the merger transaction then the employee may be
eligible.
Example
2: A pool reduction
is made in the 1st District pool in Seattle and the
employee reduced from the pool cannot hold in Seattle and
displaces to the Portland extra board.
This is a seniority move not caused by a merger
transaction and the employee is not eligible for a merger
relocation.
Example
3: If the facts are
the same as (2) above except the engineer is forced to a
yard assignment that they could not be forced to prior to
the merger,
they are eligible for a relocation if mileage provisions
are met.
Example
4: An engineer is
required to relocate to Oakridge for pool, extra board or
helper service. The engineer is not entitled to the “in
lieu of” provisions but is entitled to New York Dock
provisions.
Q51.
Does it matter in the example 2 above if the extra
board they place on is consolidated or prior right?
A51.
No, since the First “District had extra board
positions in Portland prior to the merger.
Q52.
If the engineer in example 3 above could have
placed on an extra board assignment and elect to place on
a yard assignment are they entitled to a relocation
allowance?
A52.
No, that would be a seniority move.
Q53.
Are there any seniority moves that will be treated
as required to relocate?
A53.
Yes, at Eugene, when pool and extra board positions
are moved to Portland for the Portland-Oakridge service,
senior engineers on a one for one basis may bid to
Portland and be treated as required to relocate.
Example
1: Ten pool and
three extra board positions are moved to Portland from
Eugene. The
thirteen highest bidders at Eugene may relocate and be
eligible for the allowance if they meet the mileage
requirements and not outbid by employees from other
locations. If an employee at Salem outbids on one of the
Portland positions that bid will be treated as a seniority
move and no relocation will be allowed since no work was
relocated from Salem.
It does not matter if the engineer working at Salem
lives in Eugene. Since
there is no work being transferred from Salem that is the
deciding factor.
Example
2: Ten pool and
three extra board positions are moved to Portland from
Eugene. Twelve
Eugene engineers bid on the positions and one employee
remains, whose position was abolished or who was bumped,
and who is unable to hold a position within thirty miles
of Eugene. That
employee bumps an employee at Salem.
The Salem employee displaces to Portland because
he/she can no longer hold within thirty miles of Salem.
If they meet the mileage requirements then both
engineers would be eligible for the relocation allowance.
Example
3: Ten pool and
three extra board positions are moved to Portland from
Eugene. Twelve
Eugene engineers bid on the positions and one employee
who is able to hold a position within thirty miles
of Eugene bumps an employee at Salem.
The Salem employee displaces to Portland because
he/she can no longer hold within thirty miles of Salem.
Neither employee is eligible for an allowance because the
chain of moves was started by a seniority move by an
employee who could have remained at Eugene or followed
his/her work to Portland and voluntarily chose not to do
so.
Example
4: Ten pool and
three extra board positions are moved to Portland from
Eugene. The
thirteen highest bidders at Eugene may relocate and be
eligible for the allowance if they meet the mileage
requirements. At
some time in the future, one of the engineers who
relocated retires. Another
employee at Eugene makes application for the vacancy.
This is a seniority move and the employee is not
eligible for a relocation allowance under this agreement.
Q54.
As positions are added to Portland, at what point
are engineers no longer entitled to relocations
allowances?
A54.
The Agreement provides for a two year window for
applying for relocation allowances.
Q55.
Are there mileage components that govern the
eligibility for an allowance?
A55.
Yes, the engineer must have a reporting point
farther than his/her old reporting point and at least 30
highway miles between the current home and the new
reporting point and at least 30 highway miles between
reporting points.
Example
1: The relocating of
the on-duty point for road crews from Brooklyn to Albina,
both within the Portland Terminal does not trigger a
relocation allowance.
Example
2: An employee owns
a home in Portland. Due
to his/her seniority they are unable to hold at Portland
and works in Eugene.
When positions are moved to Portland from Eugene
the employee is a successful bidder or is forced.
Because they own a home in Portland they are not
eligible for a relocation allowance back to their home.
Example
3: An employee owns
a home thirty-two (32) miles south of Portland and works
in Albany forty miles from his home.
He/she is bumped as a result of the merger and can
hold at Portland and places on an assignment at that
location. Because
the new reporting point is closer to his residence than
his/her old reporting point no relocation
allowance is provided.
Q56.
When did the person need to be a home owner to
qualify as one for relocation purposes?
A56.
New York Dock protects home owners due to loss on
sale of home that are caused by the merger.
If a non home owner purchases a home after the
merger was approved in September 1996 would not be
affected by the merger because they were not a home owner
at that time.
Q57.
Will engineers be allowed temporary lodging when
relocating?
A57.
Engineers entitled to
relocation provisions shall be given temporary
lodging for thirty (30) consecutive days as long as they
are marked up.
Q58.
Are there any restrictions on routing of traffic or
combining assignments.
A58.
There are no restrictions on the routing of traffic
in the Portland Hub
once the 30 day notice of implementation has lapsed.
There will be a single collective bargaining
agreement and limitations that currently exist in that
agreement will govern (e.g. radius provisions for road
switchers, road/yard moves etc.).
However, none of these restrictions cover through
freight routing. The
combining of assignments
between the Carriers is covered in this agreement
and is permitted.
Q59.
Will the Carrier offer separation allowances?
A59.
The Carrier will review its manpower needs at each
location and may offer separation allowances if the
Carrier determines that they will assist in the merger
implementations.
Q60.
When will reserve
boards be established and under what conditions will they
be governed?
A60.
Depending on manpower needs there may be engineers
on reserve boards on implementation day.
The reserve boards will be effective on that day
however agreement provisions requiring all vacancies to be
filled and the displacement of engineers not entitled to
reserve board positions must be complied with prior to the
Carrier opening reserve board positions.
The reserve board provisions of the controlling CBA
will govern its operation.
Q61.
What period will be used for the TPA?
A61.
1997.
Q62.
How will Union Officers TPA’s be established?
A62.
The Carrier will average the two above and two
below in any service.
If greater than their regular TPA it shall be used.
Engineers with unusually high or low TPA’s will
not be considered.
Article
VIII -FAMILIARIZATION
Q63.
Are there different ways engineers can be
familiarized on new territory?
A63.
Yes, the parties have tried different methods on
different territories and find that several methods work.
This has included riding with another crew, using a
pilot or peer trainer and/or having a company officer
onboard.
Q64.
How will the reserve, familiarization and temporary
transfer boards interact?
A64.
Familiarization and temporary transfer boards will be
used first as they provide work opportunities for engineers.
Reserve Board usage depends on the manpower dynamics.
They may be used if engineers are not needed as
trainmen, however engineers will not be placed on reserve
boards if non-protected employees in either craft could be
furloughed. If
a protected engineer was to be furloughed even if demoted to
train service, then reserve boards may be used at a location
for surplus employees.
Part of these dynamics is dependent on the impact on
other employees who may have reserve board opportunities in
another craft. In
any event the controlling CBA will govern the operation of
the reserve board.
Q65.
Will an engineer on the extra board moving to the
familiarization board lose any guarantee?
A65.
Since the familiarization board is an extension of
the extra board, an engineer would not lose any guarantee
unless they absented themselves.
Q66.
On implementation will all engineers be contacted
concerning job placement?
A66.
No, the implementation process will be phased in and
engineers will remain on their assignments unless abolished
or combined and then they may place on another assignment.
When the Carrier posts the notice on pool changes and
increases and decreases in extra boards Local Chairman may
assist in handling the bidding, application and placement
process at that time and engineers may be contacted for
placement if insufficient bids are received.
The new seniority rosters will be available for use
by engineers who have a displacement.
Q67.
Will engineers have a displacement to the newly
designated yard assignments under the percentage provisions
upon implementation?
A67.
No, they become effective only when the events in
question and answer 66 take place.
Q68.
If all yard
assignments are filled and the Carrier abolishes an
assignment, what is the bumping process?